@Oneness: You teach that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are different manifestations of the one God. You teach that Jesus and the Father, while being the same divine being, function in distinct roles. You teach that the distinctions made by Jesus do not imply separate persons but rather distinct functions within God as a unified being. You teach that the relational dynamics between Jesus and the Father are understood as roles within the one divine being. You teach that there are functional distinctions within God's singular personhood. You teach that God is a single person manifesting in different roles. You do not teach that the Father alone is the Most High God, even though this can be inferred from your Articles of Faith. You do not teach that Jesus might be regarded as a god, but is not the Most High God.
@Oneness: I teach that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are distinct beings and only the Father is the Most High God. I teach that Jesus and the Father, are not the same divine being functioning in distinct roles. I teach that the distinctions made by Jesus do imply separate persons rather than distinct functions within God as a unified being. I teach that the relational dynamics between Jesus and the Father are not to be understood as roles within the one divine being but rather as distinct beings united in the same way that believers should be united, such as how Peter was united with Paul and John. I teach that God's singular personhood is due to the fact He is indeed one person, the Father, and the Lord, Jesus, is His Son, the Christ who has been sent by Him. I teach that God is a single person, the Father, and His manifestations have been first through prophets and then eventually through His Son, each because they sent by Him and thus they manifested Him by giving the world His light. I teach that the Father alone is the Most High God. I teach that Jesus might be regarded as a god, but is not the Most High God.
