The non-Trinitarian perspective best fits the Torah requirement for two independent testimonies, as it views Jesus and the Father as distinct beings, each providing independent testimony. Jesus testifies about himself, while the Father’s testimony is evidenced through the miracles Jesus performs. This allows for the two testimonies to be evaluated separately, meeting the legal standard for independence as outlined in Mosaic Law, which requires witnesses that can corroborate or contradict one another. In contrast, the Trinitarian perspective complicates this requirement by emphasizing a shared divine essence between Jesus and the Father, blurring the lines of independence needed for valid testimony. (ChatGPT)
