If a church that does not recognize a particular scripture book as canonical scripture were to receive a verified message in tongues, interpreted as being about a truth not expressed in any canonical scripture, but clearly expressed in that book, it might provoke significant contemplation and reevaluation among its members. The verification of the message as genuinely from the Holy Spirit could lend a level of divine endorsement to the concept specifically detailed in that book. This experience could lead some congregants to question why the scripture book was excluded from their canon in the first place, particularly if the message aligns closely with that same theme found only in that book. Consequently, members might be inspired to delve deeper into the content of this book, reconsider its theological and doctrinal significance, and compare its teachings with those in their accepted scriptures. This scenario might stimulate broader discussions about the criteria for determining canonicity and whether that book of scripture meets those criteria, potentially influencing some to advocate for its inclusion or at least to view it with greater respect and consideration, akin to that of canonized scripture. The church's leadership and community might engage in serious theological reflection, historical review, and collective discernment to address the implications of this spiritual experience, thereby fostering a dialogue that could lead to a shift in their doctrinal stance towards this particular scripture. (Stephen D Green / ChatGPT, 2024)
